RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200799 SEPARATION DATE: 20011114
BOARD DATE: 20130305
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty, E1/PVT, Initial Entry Trainee, medically separated for
exertional rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria with renal failure and coagulopathy. The CI
developed an episode of rhabdomylosis during her first week of training. Although she
recovered, the condition was disqualifying for continued military service due to the risk for
recurrence. She was issued a permanent P3/L2 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation
Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the exertional rhabdomyolysis with myogolbinuria with
renal failure and coagulopathy condition(s) as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the
Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)/Department of Defense Instruction
(DoDI) 1332.39. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability
rating.
CI CONTENTION: These conditions were a result of active duty and retirement should be
warranted.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Any conditions or contention not
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards defined scope of review, remain
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB Dated 20010904
VA (25 Mos. Post-Separation) NSC
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis
w/myoglobinuria w/renal
failure and coagulopathy
5099-5021
0%
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis
w/myoglobinuria w/renal
failure and coagulopathy
7599-7502
NSC
20031215
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
0% X 0 / Not Service-Connected x 1
Combined: 0%
Combined: NSC
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis with Myoglobinuria with Renal failure and Coagulopathy. The MEB
narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 14 August 2001 noted that on 25 June 2001 the CI
collapsed after performing strenuous activity (sit-ups, push-ups and running). The MEB
NARSUM noted there was a pre-service history of difficulty tolerating physical activity;
overheats and needs a time out. Laboratory testing immediately in the emergency room
evidenced rhabdomyolysis, the abnormal breakdown of muscle tissue causing myoglobinuria
(muscle protein in the urine), acute renal failure and coagulopathy. She was hospitalized for
treatment. The CI responded well to the treatment and was discharged a few days later in a
stable condition with the recommendation to follow up regularly with her civilian physician.
Although the CIs medical condition completely resolved and there were no complications or
residuals such as coagulopathy or compartment syndrome, a permanent profile and
subsequent MEB evaluation were recommended. The MEB exam dictated 11 July 2001 noted a
normal physical exam with normal blood pressure, and no edema. There was minimal
tenderness of the quadriceps muscle, but without any evidence of muscle complications. Full
recovery without sequelae was anticipated. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam
performed on 15 December 2003, 2 years after separation, complete resolution of the episode
of rhabdomyolysis was recorded, physical examination and laboratory testing was normal.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB rated the condition 0% analogously to code 5021 (myositis). The VA adjudicated a coding
analogously to 7502 (chronic nephritis) but denied service-connection citing a condition that
completely resolved. The Board considered the episode of exertional rhabdomyolysis with
myoglobinuria with renal failure and coagulopathy as well as short term and long term
consequences of it. However, it was an isolated episode that resolved completely with
adequate medical care and no residual disability was demonstrated. In July 2001, 4 months
prior to separation both the physical exam and laboratory work returned to normal and the CI
continued to maintain a healthy state 2 years after separation, when the C&P exam was
performed. No rating could be assigned under either codes 5021 or 7502 chosen by the PEB
and respectively VA given the fact that patient did not have edema, high blood pressure or
abnormal laboratory results, included in the rating criteria. No other rating options could be
considered as the CI recovered without impairment. After due deliberation, considering all of
the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there
was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the exertional
rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria with renal failure and coagulopathy condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the exertional rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria with renal
failure and coagulopathy condition and IAW VASRD §4.115b, the Board unanimously
recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the
Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis with Myoglobinuria with Renal Failure
and Coagulopathy
5099-5021
0%
Rating
0%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120617, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130005089 (PD201200799)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation and hereby deny the individuals application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of
Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision
by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00108
These were not documented by the PEB or MEB and are therefore not within the purview of the Board.In addition, the Board determined that the preponderance of evidence does not support the VA determination that the restrictive lung disease conditionwas a residual condition resulting from the unfitting rhabdomyolysis condition. It was determined that he was non-deployable and an MEB indicated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00523
All evidence to two Heat Strokes is in Military Medical Records. Even though I suffered two (2) Heat Strokes and was told I was being discharged for it, I do not receive any rating what so ever for it. Recurrent Heat Stroke with Rhabdomyolysis Condition .
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW SEPARATION DATE: 20030728 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200904 BOARD DATE: 20121219 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that the covered individual (CI) was an Army National Guard PFC/E‐3 (63W0/Wheel Vehicle Mechanic), medically separated for “rhabdomyositis post episode of rhabdomyolysis, with chronic back and chest pain, without limitation of motion.” During the...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00896
The PEB adjudicated the heat stroke with rhabdomyolysis as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. CI CONTENTION : “I got discharged from the U. S. Army due to a Heat Stroke and Rhabdomyolysis. Please review copies of my Army medical records.” In Item #14 (continuation of VA Rating Information), the CI stated: “The Department of Veterans Affairs denied me a rating (0%)...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00904
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Rhabdomyolysis Condition . No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12-months of separation or contended by the CI.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00892
SEPARATION DATE: 20060426 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Heat Exhaustion7999-79000%Isolated Episode of Heath Intolerance7999-7900NSC*20070511Low Back Pain with L5 Mild RadiculopathyNot UnfittingLumbar Strain523710%20070511Migraine HeadachesNot UnfittingMigraines81000%20070511Antisocial Personality DisorderNot UnfittingPTSD and Antisocial Personality Disorder9411NSC**20070529No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 220070529 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 30%Derived from...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01332
The 7900 code used by the PEB and 5025 rating code by the VA reflects the fact that there is no code specific for rhabdomyolysis.The VA used the service treatment records (STRs) and rated the condition at 10% based on the use of pain medication for control. A 10% rating under the 7900 and 5025 codes requires continuous use of medication for control of the condition. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00034
The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a VA clinic examination on 12 October 2007, 4 months after separation, there was no weakness, muscle atrophy, with normal gait but persistent muscle pain.At the...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00035
ER evaluation revealed heat injury, acute renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis and he was admitted to the hospital. In the matter of the migraine headaches, left knee pain or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00422
The PEB adjudicated the s/p mitral ring repair with post-operative atrial fibrillation on chronic anticoagulation and anti- arrhythmic therapy as unfitting and rated it 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.”...